Category Archive for: ‘Litigation and procedure’

What’s in a name? Saks v “Snaks” trade mark dispute

 (Unfortunately, not for human consumption. Some of the treats available from “Snaks 5th Avenchew”.) They say dogs are (wo)man’s best friend, but apparently the team over at Saks 5th Avenue missed the memo. The luxury U.S. department store had a less than friendly reaction to discovering a small online business retailing specialty canine and equine treats under the name “Snaks …

Read More
Partner:

Website blocking injunction issued for trade mark infringement

The importance of trade marks to luxury brands has always been a happy coincidence for this IP Whiteboard blogger, so when Justice Arnold handed down his latest decision in relation to counterfeit goods in the UK High Court, I (momentarily) ceased flicking through the latest issue of Vogue and switched over to Bailii (the UK’s case law database, and equally …

Read More
Partner:

“HOW” does matter – ethics company sues yoghurt

Imagine this: you’re a best-selling author and CEO. You’ve spent years building your brand, working hard to distil it down to one word, “HOW”, which you’ve registered as a trade mark. You host a meeting with a prospective client, an advertising agency, during which you discuss “HOW” and its meaning. A few months go by, and a certain yoghurt company …

Read More
Partner:

New rules for recording and broadcasting judgments in the NSW Supreme Court

In news that will be of particular interest to media organisations, the Supreme Court of NSW has introduced new rules that provide for judgment to be recorded and broadcast. Under the new rules (Part 9A of the Supreme Court Act 1970 and Part 13 of the Supreme Court Rules 1970), a person may apply to the Court for permission to …

Read More
Partner:

Domain name disputes and the onus of truth

Avid readers of this blog might be aware of the au Dispute Resolution Policy (the “auDRP”). The purpose of the auDRP is to provide a cheaper, speedier, alternative to litigation for the resolution of dispute between the registrant of a domain name and a party claiming competing rights in that domain name. The auDRP is our version of ICANN’s UDRP, …

Read More
Partner:

Google around the world: privacy, e-commerce and the “right to be forgotten”

A panel of people appointed by Google is meeting in Madrid today to debate the balance between privacy and freedom of information. This is the first of seven meetings set to take place across various European capitals, instigated by the “internet giant” after the controversial “right to be forgotten” ruling of the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) in May this …

Read More
Partner:

The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes: a warning against “disreputable” licence fees

Klinger, a Sherlock Holmes expert and co-editor of an anthology inspired by Sherlock Holmes, has been praised for performing a “public service” in fighting the Conan Doyle Estate (the Estate) for the right to use characters taken from Sherlock Holmes stories published before 1923.  At the same time, Judge Posner issued a strong warning to the Estate for its business …

Read More
Partner:

The case for judicial humour: When wit and jocularity find their way into the courtroom

Addressing the National Judicial Orientation Programme in 1998, then Chief Justice Gleeson explained to the assembled audience that there are four key aspects of judicial status or performance – independence, impartiality, fairness and competence. One trait deliberately left off his Honour’s list was judicial humour. While Gleeson CJ cautioned the collected judges against displays of judicial wit, this advice has not …

Read More

Meme money: New currency wears sunglasses

The explosion of interest in bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies has continued to expand. The latest is Coinye, inspired by rapper Kanye West. We take you through its rapid rise, evolution into a half-man-half-fish hybrid and sudden fall after Kanye West sued the developers.

Read More
Partner:

Page 3 of 12«12345»10...Last »