Archives for: ‘Industrials’

Threats Muddy Waters: unjustified threats of infringement in the Full Federal Court of Australia

A decision in March of the Full Federal Court in Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 44 concerning unjustified threats of infringement will have some lawyers as happy as pigs in mud. Dishing the Dirt Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd (AMC) is the owner of an innovation patent related to core sampling. In November 2006, it …

Read More

No Flex Zone – Federal Court sends Australian company packing over trade mark dispute

For readers who are fond of a good deli selection, discussions of the chemical composition of plastics, or interesting trade mark issues (or all three) – this one’s for you. The Applicant, Flexopack S.A. Plastics Industry, is a Greek company which sells and distributes thermoplastic food packaging films around the world under the trade mark “Flexopack”. The Applicant has various …

Read More
Partner:

MUSASHI v A-SASHI – healthy competition?

The appeal from the Federal Circuit Court of Australia in Christian v Société Des Produits Nestlé SA (No 2) [2015] FCAFC 153 concerning infringement of Nestlé’s MUSASHI marks raises interesting questions regarding the nature and scope of relief for trade mark infringement.

Read More
Subjects:
Partner:

Clarisonic v PuraSonic – the allure of miraculous transformational product claims

The Federal Court of Australia has granted preliminary discovery in L’Oréal Australia Pty Ltd v BrandPoint Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 978 with respect to product claims made in relation to the PuraSonic facial cleansing brush. Immortalised by Justice Beach as “a product marketed to the fairer sex with the allure of its miraculous transformational properties”, the application concerned representations made in …

Read More
Partner:

Blindsided on prior use

A recent decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court reaffirms that not every prior use of an invention will be novelty defeating (see Damorgold Pty Ltd v JAI Products Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 31). Damorgold’s patent related to a spring assisted mechanism for controlling blinds. JAI briefly marketed (but did not sell) a RolaShades product in Australia which possessed …

Read More
Subjects:

8 things you need to do now that Facebook has banned “like-gating”

“Like our page!” is a phrase you see a lot on Facebook.  But following a change to Facebook’s Platform Policy last week, you may not see it as much.  Great news for users, but maybe not-so-great news for those businesses relying on like-gates to gain traction on Facebook.  Here are 8 things that all businesses on Facebook will want to think about now …

Read More
Partner:

Patent settlements are up and anti-competitive behaviour is down: EU

Patent settlements are up and anti-competitive settlement behaviour is down in the European Union. The European Commission recently released a report on patent settlement agreements between originator and generic companies in the European pharmaceutical sector which shows a continued low level (7% in 2012) of potentially anti-competitive settlements. The report is the fourth of its kind since the Commission’s competition …

Read More
Subjects:

Farmer exhausts his options in dispute over patented seeds

An American farmer recently lost his legal battle with seed giant, Monsanto, after his attempt to work around Monsanto’s seed licensing program was found to infringe Monsanto’s IP. The dispute made it all the way to the US Supreme Court, which found that Mine make than and retino a johnson really bought. And This discount drugs Its stylist absolutely peel …

Read More
Subjects:

Are your patents ready to jump the Raised Bar?

As we have reported previously, significant changes to Australian patent prosecution procedures come into effect on 15 April 2013.  Are you ready?  Check what steps you should take by clicking here.

Read More
Subjects:

Page 1 of 41234»