Promises, promises: Full Federal Court of Australia finds invention useful in ESCO Corporation v Ronneby Road

We can all be guilty of promising more than we can deliver – but for a patentee, that can be fatal for the validity of your patent.  Under Australian patent law, inventions must be ‘useful’ in order to be patentable, and one of the complex elements of this requirement is whether any promises made with read more...
Subjects: Patents


Second throw of the dice unsuccessful: Full Federal Court confirms Hepatitis C drug patent is invalid

The recent decision of the Full Court in Idenix Pharmaceuticals v Gilead Sciences [2017] FCAFC 196 illustrates the power of the grounds of lack of utility and lack of sufficiency under section 40 of the Patents Act when challenging the validity of a patent. The decision concerned lack of utility and lack of sufficiency as those grounds read more...
Subjects: Patents